KJV vs. Jehovah's Witnesses: A Scriptural Refutation of the Watchtower Society Audiobook By David Michael Curtis cover art

KJV vs. Jehovah's Witnesses: A Scriptural Refutation of the Watchtower Society

 Virtual Voice Sample

Get 30 days of Standard free

Auto-renews at $8.99/mo after 30-day trial. Cancel anytime
Try for $0.00
More purchase options

KJV vs. Jehovah's Witnesses: A Scriptural Refutation of the Watchtower Society

By: David Michael Curtis
Narrated by: Virtual Voice
Try for $0.00

$8.99 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy for $14.99

Buy for $14.99

Background images

This title uses virtual voice narration

Virtual voice is computer-generated narration for audiobooks.

KJV vs. Jehovah’s Witnesses is a direct, Scripture-only examination of the core doctrinal claims made by the Watchtower Society—tested line by line against the King James Bible.

This book does not rely on church tradition, academic commentary, or theological systems. Instead, it applies a strict topical Bible study method: gathering every relevant verse, examining the plain English text, and allowing Scripture to interpret itself without contradiction.

Inside, you will find 100 concise summary answers followed by 100 comprehensive deep dives, covering key issues such as:

  • The preservation of God’s words
  • The claim of Bible corruption
  • The New World Translation and its textual changes
  • The nature of God and the identity of Jesus Christ
  • Salvation by faith versus works
  • Authority: Scripture versus organization

Each claim is tested openly and logically. Every conclusion is designed to be verifiable by the reader using the Bible alone.

This is not an argument built on opinion. It is a challenge.

If the Word of God is truly preserved, then it can withstand examination. If it has been corrupted, that claim must be proven.

This book invites you to test both.

 Apologetics Christianity Theology
All stars
Most relevant
After I got an hour or so into this, I was very disappointed when it came to John 1:1c. The author stated that inserting the indefinite article "a" into the text was wrong because there is NO indefinite article in the Greek text there. Did you know that the KJV uses the indefinite article "a" 1911 times in the New Testament? In each one of those times, the indefinite article is missing from the Greek Text. Why is that? Because the Greek simply does not have indefinite articles. Because of this, the translator has to add the indefinite article when translating from Greek to English. So, because theos is anarthrous at John 1:1c, it is possible to translate that clause at "the word was a god."

Misleading

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.