Bards, Rise! Podcast By BBS Radio BBS Network Inc. cover art

Bards, Rise!

Bards, Rise!

By: BBS Radio BBS Network Inc.
Listen for free

This is not your typical awakening show. Not only will I show you the corruption, unconstitutionality, and very dark side of government, I will explain what you can do about it. I will teach you how to spot agents of the dark, call them out, and push back against the matrix, peacefully and powerfully. I will explain what I’ve done to grow my light significantly and find peace. Let me help you step into your sovereignty, power and freedom, and crash the matrix. I’ve had many experiences in my life that have prepared me for this radio show: seeing supernatural religious phenomenon as a child; spending time in “the programs” (SSP); instant healing of a lifelong medical condition; foretelling of 9/11; being disbarred and railroaded into jail for six months for a crime I did not commit, in retaliation for disclosing that New York State is by definition “tyranny,” the New York State judicial branch has created a child peonage system in family and divorce courts, and the vast majority of judges in New York State are serial felons under both federal and state law; and having my children stolen from me by a corrupt, masonic and satanic court system. Yet, I now know a peace I have never known before. Join me and let’s do this together.Copyright 2026 Michael Deem Social Sciences
Episodes
  • Bards, Rise!, March 26, 2026

    Bards, Rise!, March 26, 2026
    Mar 27 2026
    Bards, Rise! with host Michael Deem A legal battle for constitutional property rights against Debt Slavery This episode of Bard’s Rise features host Michael Dean and guests Mike and Leah as they discuss their high-stakes legal battle to reclaim their properties through Federal Land Patents. The discussion covers the constitutional superiority of legal title over bank-held equitable title and details a recent physical confrontation regarding warning signs placed for prospective buyers. The Legal Framework: Federal Land Patents vs. Equitable Title Mike and Leah's defense rests on the "Federal Land Patent" process, which traces property ownership back to the original grant from the U.S. government. According to the Michigan Supreme Court case Klais and U.S. Supreme Court precedent in Fenn v. Holme, a federal land patent represents the highest form of legal title. The host argues that while state courts often allow banks to foreclose using "equitable title" (mortgages and sheriff's deeds), federal law and the Seventh Amendment grant patent holders the right to a common law trial where such equitable claims cannot defeat a superior legal title. Active Litigation and the "Fire Sale" Mike and Leah are currently engaged in two major lawsuits. The first, Mike and Leah v. Choice One Bank (Case 26cv163), is pending in the Western District of Michigan, with an emergency appeal currently before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding a preliminary injunction. Simultaneously, they are suing the State of Michigan, including Governor Whitmer and Attorney General Nessel, challenging the constitutionality of the state's foreclosure statutes. Amidst this litigation, Choice One Bank has initiated "fire sales" of the Mike and Leah's properties—a school and a custom-built home—listing them at roughly half their estimated market value to quickly transfer the "hot potato" to unsuspecting buyers. The Signage Confrontation and "Caveat Emptor" To protect potential buyers, Mike and Leah placed a 6x9 foot warning sign on an adjacent property owned by Leah’s mother, stating "Buyer Beware" and citing their federal case number. The sign was repeatedly removed, leading to a confrontation with a Choice One Bank representative and local police. Mike and Leah emphasize the doctrine of Caveat Emptor (buyer beware), warning that if they win their federal case, any third-party purchaser would likely be evicted by U.S. Marshals without recourse against Mike and Leah. Mike and Leah's case represents a fundamental challenge to the modern banking and foreclosure system, positioning the 19th-century Federal Land Patent as a constitutional shield against 21st-century debt practices. While Choice One Bank continues to push for a rapid sale of the contested properties, the pending federal litigation and Mike and Leah's aggressive public notice campaign have created a complex legal environment that may set a significant precedent for property rights nationwide.
    Show more Show less
    57 mins
  • Bards, Rise!, March 12, 2026

    Bards, Rise!, March 12, 2026
    Mar 13 2026
    Bards, Rise! with host Michael Deem Bard's Rise: The Struggle for Property Rights and Land Patents Bard's Rise: The Homesteading Siege Saga Mike & Leah’s legal crusade to reclaim property rights through Land Patents. Broadcast: March 12, 2026 #LandPatent #7thAmendment #PropertyRights #CaveatEmptor Host: Michael Deem | Guest: Mike & Leah Duration: 49:19 | Target: Homeowners & Legal Reformers Active Legal Fronts 6th Circuit Court of Appeals (Case 26-1238) Motion for Preliminary Injunction to restore possession of the family home. Quiet Title vs. Choice One Bank Challenging "equitable title" with superior Land Patents and 7th Amendment jury rights. Constitutional Challenge vs. Michigan Naming 5 defendants including the Governor and AG regarding statutory framework violations. Strategic Outreach Contacted Top 25 Podcasters (Rogan, Carlson, Kelly). Received encouraging response from White House staff regarding "restoring fairness." Educating the public on Land Patents and the "debt slavery" mortgage system. The Human Cost “ All I want for my birthday is our house back. — Mike's Birthday Wish Incident Log • Police Presence: Multiple vehicles observed at the property; suspected bank-ordered escort. • Cramped Living: Large family currently managing in temporary, restricted space. • Business Limbo: Daughter's coffee shop startup paused; equipment in storage. This episode of Bard's Rise features host Michael Deem and guests Mike and Leah as they discuss their ongoing legal battle to reclaim their homestead and community center. The conversation centers on the emotional impact of their eviction, the strategic use of federal land patents, and the broader movement to protect American homeowners from corporate foreclosure systems. Detailed Summary Personal Impact and Recent Developments Mike and Leah recently finished vacating their community center and home, a process that included moving heavy construction equipment and coffee shop fixtures over a difficult weekend. The family is currently staying on a property adjacent to their former home, allowing them to witness police presence and unidentified cleaning crews occupying their house, which has caused significant emotional distress for both the parents and their children. During the show, it was revealed that Mike’s only wish for his recent birthday was simply to have his home back. ⚖️ Active Legal Framework Case 1: Quiet Title vs. Choice One Bank to establish superior legal title via land patents. Case 2: Constitutional Challenge vs. State of Michigan regarding statutory foreclosure frameworks. Case 3: Federal Appeal (Case #26-1238) seeking a preliminary injunction for immediate repossession. Legal Strategy and Federal Appeals The legal team has escalated the fight to the federal level, filing a motion for a preliminary injunction with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (Case #26-1238). This motion seeks to return the family to their property while the case is finalized. Michael Deem noted that Choice One Bank has recently conceded facts in their filings that support an action for "ejectment," which the team plans to use to supplement their complaint. The strategy relies heavily on educating the court about the history of land patents and the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial, which they argue is being bypassed by Michigan’s current state laws. Corporate Exploitation and Public Outreach The discussion highlighted the role of "HP Foreclosure Solutions" and "BSJ Real Estate," entities that purchased the property for significantly less than its accumulated equity. Mike and Leah shared their frustration after attempting to serve these companies with legal notices, only to have all certified mail returned because the entities provided no valid physical address. To bring national attention to these "windfall" foreclosures, the hosts have reached out to the top 25 podcasters in the country. They also shared an encouraging response from White House staff, indicating that their situation is being monitored as part of a larger effort to restore fairness to property law. Media & Government Outreach 🎙️ Top 25 Podcasters Information sent to Rogan, Carlson, and others. 🏛️ White House Received encouraging message regarding "clarity and resolution." Key Data Sixth Circuit Court Case Number: 26-1238. Public Call-in Numbers: 888-627-6008 (Toll-free USA) and 323-744-4831 (Direct). Involved Entities: Choice One Bank, HP Foreclosure Solutions, and BSJ Real Estate. Historical Context: The Homestead Act entitlement of 160 acres was cited as the intended foundation for American land ownership. To-Do / Next Steps Michael Deem will post the five primary legal documents to the current show page for public review. The legal team will file a motion to supplement the First Amended Complaint based on recent concessions made by Choice One Bank. Mike and Leah are considering installing large banners on their adjacent family-owned land to warn potential buyers...
    Show more Show less
    49 mins
  • Bards, Rise!, March 5, 2026

    Bards, Rise!, March 5, 2026
    Mar 6 2026
    Bards, Rise! with host Michael Deem The Legal Siege of Bard's Rise: Federal Land Patents and the Reality of Eviction Bard's Rise: The Homesteading Saga Episode Analysis: Legal Battles, Federal Land Patents, and the Reality of Eviction (March 5, 2026) "It's a paper war. A war on who can write the best papers... but the system feels rigged against those without an attorney." — Leah & Mike, on their Pro Se legal battle Core Legal Arguments Federal Land Patent vs. Sovereign Citizen Explicitly distancing from the "Sovereign Citizen" movement to maintain legal credibility in federal court. Irreparable Harm Eviction from "Unique Property" (a custom-built 20-year home and a 60k sq ft community center) cannot be remedied by money. Procedural Failure Magistrate judge effectively denied the TRO by scheduling hearings after the eviction dates. Key Context #LandPatent #PropertyRights #ProSe #Eviction #FederalCourt Case Status Home Eviction:Completed (Mar 3) Business Eviction:In Progress Active Case 1:26-cv-163 (ChoiceOne) Active Case 2:26-cv-449 (vs. Michigan) Appeal:6th Circuit Pending Human Impact 3 of 4 children raised in the home. Mike built the house personally 21 years ago. Massive loss of equipment and inventory (siding, tools, coffee shop gear) due to storage constraints. Host: Michael Deem | Guests: Mike & Leah Est. Reading Time: 4 mins | Length: 36:52 Introduction This episode of Bard's Rise features host Michael Deem and guests Mike and Leah as they recount the harrowing experience of being evicted from their long-term family home and business properties. The discussion centers on the legal distinction of federal land patents, the systemic challenges faced by pro se litigants, and the emotional toll of a "paper war" against institutional banking and state interests. 1. Defining the Legal Identity: Federal Land Patents vs. Sovereign Citizens A critical portion of the discussion is dedicated to clarifying the legal framework Mike and Leah are utilizing. Host Michael Deem explicitly distances their movement from "sovereign citizens," a term often used by opposing counsel to discredit litigants. Instead, they identify strictly as federal land patent holders. While the term "allodial title" was previously used by AI-generated summaries of the show, Deem clarifies that they acknowledge state regulation and are not claiming to be above the law but rather seeking to invoke specific rights granted under federal land patents. The guests emphasize that they have never identified as sovereign citizens and believe such labels are tactical attempts by the opposition to prejudice the court. Legal Framework Comparison Position Description Sovereign Citizen Often associated with total immunity from taxes/laws; rejected by the guests. Land Patent Holder Reliance on federal land grants and constitutional supremacy; subject to state law. Note: The defense relies on the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution to argue that federal land patents supersede state court eviction orders. 2. The Physical and Emotional Toll of Eviction The narrative shifts to the recent evictions of Mike and Leah from two distinct properties: their custom-built family home and a massive community center. On March 3rd, the family was forced to vacate the home they built 20 years ago and where they raised their four children. Due to the speed of the eviction and a lack of storage, they were forced to abandon significant personal property, including heavy furniture and full kitchen cupboards. The second eviction involved a 60,000 to 70,000 square foot building that served as a hub for three family businesses: a construction company, a coffee shop, and a community center. Despite having a crew of 15 people helping, the sheer volume of equipment and inventory—including commercial kitchen appliances and 80 squares of siding—meant that more was left behind and likely destroyed than was successfully moved. 3. The "Paper War" and Systemic Hurdles Michael Deem criticizes the legal system's handling of the case, specifically the magistrate judge's failure to grant a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) or preliminary injunction. He argues that "irreparable harm" was clearly established because the properties are unique—one being a former middle school and the other a custom-built home. The guests express frustration with the "rigged" nature of the system, noting that while they cite dozens of cases in their filings, the opposing banks provide minimal citations yet receive favorable treatment. Furthermore, they highlight a lack of professional courtesy from the court, claiming that their phone calls as pro se litigants go unreturned. Active Legal Cases Case 1 26cv163 vs. ChoiceOne Bank Case 2 26cv449 Dalton v. Michigan Required for Injunction: 1. Likelihood of success on merits. 2. Irreparable harm (Unique Property). Key Data Property Size: The community center/business building is estimated between 60,000 and 70,000 square feet. Duration of Residency: The...
    Show more Show less
    37 mins
No reviews yet