Send us Fan Mail

Why does digital pathology adoption move faster in some places than others?

In this USCAP 2026 conversation, I sat down with Robert Moody and Fumiya Fuji from Hamamatsu to talk about what the conference theme, MAKING CONNECTIONS, really looks like in practice. This was not just a scanner conversation. It was a workflow conversation.

We talked about why digital pathology has shifted from a scanner-first mindset to a solution-first one, and why that matters for labs trying to build workflows that actually work. Robert explained why partnerships now need to happen earlier, with software, hardware, and execution teams involved from the start. Fumiya added a global perspective, comparing adoption drivers across the US, Japan, Europe, and Canada, and explaining why local support systems, ROI, geography, and government backing can all change the pace of adoption.

One point I especially liked was this: digital pathology is not one product. It is an ecosystem. And if one component fails, the whole workflow can break down. That is why connected thinking matters so much right now. This episode is really about how companies, labs, and partners are learning to work more like a team.

Key highlights

• [00:00] Why MAKING CONNECTIONS fits digital pathology so well
• [01:37] Why partnerships matter beyond the scanner
• [04:29] The shift from scanner-first to solution-first
• [04:58] How adoption differs across the US, Japan, Europe, and Canada
• [09:01] Why global collaboration inside Hamamatsu matters
• [10:50] How partnerships move from paper to real-world execution
• [12:55] Why does the USCAP show floor show a more connected industry
• [14:37] Why the next phase of digital pathology depends on interoperability and connected workflows

Support the show

Get the "Digital Pathology 101" FREE E-book and join us!

Send us Fan Mail

What makes digital pathology feel so hard to enter, even for smart people already working around it?

In this special USCAP conversation, Stephanie Fullerton from Hamamatsu turns the tables and interviews me about Digital Pathology 101 — the book I wrote for people who are starting or continuing their digital pathology journey.

We talk about why the book is not meant to be an exhaustive manual, but a practical framework. A way to help people see the full picture, ask better questions, and understand how the pieces of digital pathology fit together.

One of the biggest themes in this conversation is that digital pathology is a team effort. It is not just pathology. It involves scanners, software, image analysis, engineers, vendors, and people who often do not speak the same professional language.

That matters because sometimes getting the right answer starts with asking the right question.

We also talk about the challenge of translating expert knowledge into beginner-friendly language, why vendors often become guides as labs go through digital transformation, and why I think a shared vocabulary can make implementations smoother and more collaborative. Toward the end, we shift into the fun side of USCAP: signed book giveaways, stickers, pins, and ways to make connections at the conference.

Topics discussed

• [00:03] Why Stephanie interviewed me this time, and the idea behind Digital Pathology 101
• [01:07] What the book is actually for: a framework, not a one-size-fits-all manual
• [04:07] The hardest part of writing for beginners without talking down to them
• [06:26] Why digital pathology implementation feels like a mountain, and how to lower the barrier
• [08:15] Why a shared vocabulary matters in digital pathology teams
• [09:44] Translating between pathologists, engineers, vendors, and marketing
• [11:26] Why vendors and partners often become guides during digital transformation
• [12:33] Who the book is for, including students and early-career professionals
• [13:33] Book signing, giveaways, and where to find me at USCAP
• [19:05] Stickers, pins, and why small things can help start real conversations at conferences

Resources mentioned

• Digital Pathology 101
• Hamamatsu Booth 312 at #USCAP2026 in San Antonio, Texas
• My histology and microscopy videos on YouTube

Support the show

Get the "Digital Pathology 101" FREE E-book and join us!

Send us Fan Mail

What happens when AI looks strong in a paper, but the workflow still isn’t ready?

In DigiPath Digest #40, I reviewed five recent papers across kidney pathology, oral and maxillofacial pathology, glioma biomarker prediction, digital twins in neuro-oncology, and a major European colorectal cancer cohort. A common theme kept coming back: good performance is not the same thing as real-world readiness.

We started with kidney biopsies and the challenge of assessing interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, where AI shows promise but still does not fully agree with humans. That led into a bigger point I keep seeing in digital pathology: our “ground truth” is often based on human interpretation, and human interpretation has variability too.

From there, I looked at AI in oral and maxillofacial pathology, where the field is still early and one major bottleneck is the lack of strong public datasets. Then I discussed a systematic review on adult-type gliomas showing that multimodal models performed better than unimodal ones, which makes sense when you think about how pathologists actually work: we do not diagnose from one input alone.

I also covered a systematic review on digital twins in neuro-oncology. The idea is exciting, but the paper makes it clear that reproducibility, public code, multimodal integration, and external validation are still limiting factors.

And finally, I talked about a paper I really liked: a large European colorectal cancer cohort built across 26 biobanks in 12 countries. That kind of harmonized, quality-checked dataset matters. A lot. Because better AI starts with better data.

In this episode, I discuss:

• Why AI vs human comparisons are harder than they first look
• the “gold standard paradox” in pathology
• Why multimodal AI keeps outperforming unimodal models
• What is holding digital twins back from broader use
• Why curated multicenter datasets are so important for digital pathology research

Resources mentioned:

• Digital Pathology 101 pdf copy
• Pathology AI Makeover Course
• DigiPath Digest AI-powered paper summaries

Papers discussed:

• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41830415/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41826004/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41824546/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41823607/
• https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41820399/

Support the show

Get the "Digital Pathology 101" FREE E-book and join us!