In this episode of the Athletes Compass Podcast, the hosts explore the pros and cons of training alone versus training in a group. Recent research suggests that while both approaches can produce similar fitness outcomes, group training may lead to greater improvements in functional performance due to social support and motivation. The discussion highlights psychological drivers like self-efficacy, autonomy, and relatedness, and how they shape training success. The hosts share personal experiences with solo workouts, group sessions, and online communities, ultimately concluding that the optimal approach is often a balance tailored to an athlete’s personality, schedule, and goals.

1. Both solo and group training work – overall fitness improvements can be similar across both approaches.
2. Group training may enhance functional performance such as strength and flexibility due to social motivation.
3. Psychological factors matter – social support boosts self-efficacy and self-regulation, which can improve performance.
4. Autonomy vs relatedness – solo training supports independence, while group sessions provide connection and accountability.
5. Training context matters – competitive athletes may benefit from focused solo sessions, while others thrive in social environments.
6. Groups can push athletes beyond perceived limits, helping them discover untapped strength.
7. Races often require solo resilience, making some independent training essential.
8. A balanced approach (often around 80% solo / 20% group) can combine efficiency with motivation and social benefits.

• Paul Warloski - Simple Endurance Coaching
• Marjaana Rakai | Nordic Performance Lab