Episodes

  • The Epstein Fallout Hits Dartmouth: Students Demand Leon Black’s Name Be Removed

    The Epstein Fallout Hits Dartmouth: Students Demand Leon Black’s Name Be Removed
    Apr 24 2026
    The controversy centers on growing pressure at Dartmouth College to remove the name of billionaire donor Leon Black from its visual arts center due to his financial ties to Jeffrey Epstein. A broad coalition of students, faculty, and community members has renewed calls for the change, arguing that Black’s reported payments—totaling around $170 million—to Epstein after his 2008 conviction make his continued honor on campus unacceptable. Critics say the institution has had years to act and that continuing to keep his name on the building reflects a failure to reckon with the implications of those ties.

    In response, Dartmouth’s leadership has opted not to immediately remove the name but instead to form a committee to review naming policies across campus, a move that critics see as a delay tactic rather than meaningful action. The situation highlights a broader institutional dilemma: universities grappling with large donor contributions tied to controversial figures, where legal agreements and financial considerations complicate swift decisions. For many pushing for change, the issue goes beyond one building, reflecting a deeper tension between financial dependence on donors and the ethical responsibility to address associations with Epstein’s network.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Calls grow to rename Dartmouth building bankrolled by Epstein associate - Valley News
    Show more Show less
    19 mins
  • Clemency or Cover-Up? Lawmakers Clash Over Maxwell’s Future (4/24/26)

    Clemency or Cover-Up? Lawmakers Clash Over Maxwell’s Future (4/24/26)
    Apr 24 2026
    Members of Congress are sharply divided over the idea of a potential pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell, with the debate emerging in the context of ongoing investigations into Jeffrey Epstein’s network. Some Republicans on the House Oversight Committee have indicated they would consider supporting a pardon if it meant securing Maxwell’s full cooperation and testimony, viewing it as a possible way to extract information about Epstein’s associates. However, that position is far from unified—even within the GOP—with key figures, including the committee chair, expressing opposition. Maxwell herself previously refused to answer questions before the committee, invoking the Fifth Amendment, while her legal team has signaled she would be willing to speak more openly if granted clemency.

    Democrats, meanwhile, are unanimously opposed to any pardon scenario, framing the idea as unacceptable given Maxwell’s conviction for her role in facilitating the abuse of minors. They argue that offering clemency in exchange for testimony would undermine accountability and justice for victims. The political split, combined with public backlash and the legal reality that only the president could grant such a pardon, makes any deal unlikely in the near term. Overall, the situation highlights both the high stakes surrounding the Epstein investigation and the deep partisan divide over how far lawmakers should go to obtain new information.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Oversight members split over whether to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, committee chair says - Live Updates - POLITICO
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 4)

    Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 4)
    Apr 24 2026
    In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    1027.pdf
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 3)

    Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 3)
    Apr 24 2026
    In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    1027.pdf
    Show more Show less
    12 mins
  • Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 2)

    Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 2)
    Apr 24 2026
    In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    1027.pdf
    Show more Show less
    15 mins
  • Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 1)

    Courtney Wild And Her Jeffrey Epstein Related Deposition From 2017 (Part 1)
    Apr 24 2026
    In the 2017 video deposition of Courtney E. Wild, taken as part of the civil case Epstein v. Rothstein in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Wild testified under oath about her personal background, criminal history, and relevant circumstances before the court began substantive questions. The early portion of the deposition focuses on Wild’s identity and personal history, including her marriage, family situation, and her own past convictions, including a drug trafficking conviction for which she was serving a sentence at the Gadsden Correctional Facility in Florida at the time of the deposition. Wild was sworn in and answered basic biographical questions about her life prior to moving into the heart of the civil litigation against Epstein’s representatives and others, establishing her presence and credibility as a witness in the case’s factual record


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    1027.pdf
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • Paul Page And Prince Andrew

    Paul Page And Prince Andrew
    Apr 24 2026
    According to ex Palace guard Paul Page, Prince Andrew not only was an entitled nonce, but he was also a loudmouth who liked to verbally abuse the guards who were responsible for his safety. In this episode, we get a look at that behavior as detailed by Mr. Page.


    (commercial at 10:30)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/19047669/prince-andrew-screamed-royal-cop/
    Show more Show less
    19 mins
  • Mother Jones Hits The BOP With A FOIA Lawsuit Due To The Ghislaine Maxwell Transfer

    Mother Jones Hits The BOP With A FOIA Lawsuit Due To The Ghislaine Maxwell Transfer
    Apr 24 2026
    Mother Jones filed a FOIA lawsuit against the Bureau of Prisons after the BOP stonewalled basic questions surrounding Ghislaine Maxwell’s abrupt and unusually opaque transfer following her conviction. The magazine sought records explaining why Maxwell was moved, who authorized it, what security assessments were conducted, and whether any deviations from standard BOP transfer protocols occurred. Instead of transparency, the BOP responded with heavy redactions, delays, and categorical refusals, even though Maxwell is one of the most high-profile federal inmates in modern history and her custody directly implicates public confidence in the system after Jeffrey Epstein’s death. Mother Jones argued that the BOP’s secrecy was not about safety, but about insulating itself from scrutiny after years of documented failures, incompetence, and credibility collapse tied to Epstein and his network.


    The lawsuit highlights how the BOP reflexively treats accountability as a threat rather than an obligation, especially when the case touches Epstein-related fallout. Mother Jones made clear that this was not a fishing expedition, but a narrow request aimed at understanding whether Maxwell received preferential treatment, whether political or institutional pressure influenced her placement, and whether the BOP was quietly rewriting its own narrative to avoid further embarrassment. The BOP’s resistance only reinforced suspicions, because routine transfers are normally documented, logged, and explainable. By forcing the issue into federal court, the lawsuit underscored a broader pattern in the Epstein-Maxwell saga: when transparency is most warranted, federal agencies choose silence, obstruction, and delay, daring the public to forget rather than proving they have nothing to hide.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Mother Jones Sues the Bureau of Prisons for Ghislaine Maxwell Records – Mother Jones
    Show more Show less
    13 mins