Send us Fan Mail

In this episode, we continue analyzing the 2021 debate on King James Onlyism—and take a closer look at a historical claim that simply doesn’t hold up.

Was James I of England a Presbyterian but not a Calvinist?
Did he reject the Geneva Bible because of Calvinist theology?

The historical record tells a very different story.

Drawing from the Hampton Court Conference and the contemporary account by William Barlow, we examine what King James actually said—and why he objected to the Geneva Bible’s marginal notes.

This episode is a reminder of two crucial skills:

• Verify historical claims
• Follow the logic of arguments carefully

If you do those two things, you’ll avoid most bad arguments—especially on topics like Bible translation.

📌 Topics Covered:

• King James and Presbyterianism
• The Geneva Bible controversy
• The real reason behind the King James Version
• Calvinism vs. church polity
• Evaluating historical claims responsibly

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!

Send us Fan Mail

Weighed in the Balance helps Christians evaluate arguments and discern truth. In an age of well-produced, eloquently spoken, and highly persuasive claims, this channel asks a simple question: Is this true?

In this episode, we continue analyzing the debate between Nathan Cravatt and Mitch Canupp, focusing on a critical question: Which manuscript tradition is most trustworthy?

But as the discussion unfolds, a deeper issue emerges: inconsistency.

Can the arguments for King James Onlyism be applied universally? Or do they collapse under their own weight?

We explore:

• Lower vs. higher criticism
• Internal vs. external evidence
• The “law of first mention”
• The claim that “Egypt = bad”
• Why inconsistency may undermine the entire position

Ultimately, this episode isn’t just about Bible translations—it’s about learning how to evaluate arguments carefully and honestly.

👍 Like, comment, and subscribe for more thoughtful theological analysis.

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!

Send us Fan Mail

In this episode, we continue analyzing the 2021 debate on KJV-onlyism and examine two key passages—1 John 5:7 and Revelation 16:5—that raise serious challenges for the position.

While the King James Version remains a faithful and valuable translation, elevating it to the only acceptable English Bible creates major apologetic, theological, and interpretive problems. We also address common misconceptions about the New King James Version and its textual basis.

Quick clarification: While there are a few minor differences between the KJV and NKJV (such as “God” vs “Lord” in some places), these remain within the Textus Receptus tradition and do not indicate a shift to the Majority or Critical Text.

If you enjoy careful, charitable theological discussion, consider subscribing and joining the conversation in the comments.

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!